I suggest that ‘effective dialogue’ is a contradiction in terms. True dialogue can never be presupposed as effective, nor should the term 'effective communication'. Meaning will always lie in the interpretation afforded to message content by the recipient - never guaranteed to be the same as that intended by the communicator.
A fascinating insight Daev
I suggest that ‘effective dialogue’ is a contradiction in terms. True dialogue can never be presupposed as effective, nor should the term 'effective communication'. Meaning will always lie in the interpretation afforded to message content by the recipient - never guaranteed to be the same as that intended by the communicator.
I've analysed this here https://bit.ly/3vCMOGu